Rylsky Art
Your Pages Recently Viewed
Your Content Recently Viewed

Comments

  • 0

What a pity that with such models, Rylsky go on to do so strange retouch. You cancel all the personnality of the models - you have many good points but not the retouch that you don't control.

  • 1

which photos in this set are retouched? here is example of almost non-retouch.

  • 0

I REALLY APPRECIATE the pussy spreads of these BEAUTIFUL Women.. Keep that up PLEASE

  • 3

Welcome back, Sarika. You are a joy to behold—beautiful eyes; long, beautiful legs and easily the most beautiful breasts in the neighborhood. You brighten any day. xoxoxo

  • 4

Gorgeous woman, that Sarika. Nice poses. Excellent photography. Can't wait for the video.

  • 3

This is your first comment here, Daydreamer.
Let me thank you for joining us.

  • 2

Absolutely Gorgeous!

  • 5

Thank you all very much from me and from Sarika.
Next time she will be presented in her first video.

  • 3

Sarika is so very pretty, with an absolutely gorgeous womanly figure. Perfect curves. Very cute bottom. Very best wishes to Sarika. She is wonderful. And Rylsky, your photography is great.

  • 0

This is IMPROVEMENT, Ryl....but don't fall asleep on your laurels --- quality MUST be on this level if 'u want to be amongst the best!

10+

  • 2

Any such comment is merely an IMO. What you feel about an artist's work is a reflection of the way that particular work made you feel. We all have opinions about the work we view but it does not mean any more than what we feel. The level of work here is excellent but that does not mean that I will like it all. Each set is it's own show and our individual likes and dislikes will determine how we see it. There is no contest here. What you see is Rylsky's best effort. If it pleases you good if not it is done and cannot be changed so we must wait for the next set.

  • 1

Absolutely! Well said Hipshot.

  • 5

I will never understand what this kinda "levels" means. How can we measure improvements or fails? Colors? Megapixels? Quantity? Facial expressions? I can only say: "thank you for compliment" but I'll never understand what this compliment was about.
:)

  • 1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_quality

  • 2

it works when we judge the quality of jewelry advertising picture or landscape or macro of insect with waterdrop. It never works when we talk about senses, erotica, woman's beauty, etc. Image quality in PENTHOUSE was perfect. But:
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/sep/17/business/la-fi-mo-penthouse-magazine-owner-files-for-bankruptcy

"ashes to ashes..."

  • 0

http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/law-enforcement-bulletin/march_2011/human_sex_trafficking

  • 0

Parallax, please explain what human sex trafficking has to do with Penthouse and image quality? You leave me far, far behind....

  • 2

the only thing we discussed was QUALITY. I said (10+ times) that "quality" in erotica is no way to measure. you said "don't fall asleep on your laurels --- quality MUST be on this level if 'u want to be amongst the best!"

we know nothing about what is the best.

what answer on this? FBI link???

I promise from now never asking anything if it is so hard and became this way of "discussion"

Thanks.

  • 0

....AND Penthouse (bankruptcy)!

  • 1

FBI about the quality? Or it is just contest of longest penis here?
:)))

  • 0

Having initialed the Association Agreement with the European Union, the Ukrainian government undertook international obligations that it violates right now by voting in the Verkhovna Rada on the laws that restricts fundamental rights and freedoms of citizens of Ukraine.

According to an own UNIAN correspondent in Brussels, spokesman for European Commissioner for Enlargement and European Neighbourhood Policy Štefan Füle Peter Stano said this at press conference for journalists.

“Commissioner Füle is deeply concerned about yesterday’s events in the Verkhovna Rada concerning the legislation that violates democratic principles and restricts fundamental rights and freedoms of the Ukrainian citizens”, - said Stano.

“According to opinion of Füle, it contradicts to European aspirations of Ukraine and also contradicts to the obligations following from the Association Agreement between the EU and Ukraine that Ukrainian government undertook, having initialed the Association Agreement. We are deeply concerned about these changes in the legislation”, - added Stano.

  • 0

no comments, Parallax.

  • 0

Cf your ref
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/sep/17/business/la-fi-mo-penthouse-magazine-owner-files-for-bankruptcy

  • 0

Yes, they was "the quality" in industry. And now they are dead as project.

  • 0

Because...??

  • 1

Because quality is not enough in erotica and what is the quality if you dislike model, style, etc?

I hope this ticket is closed.

  • 2

LOL
He's been in the top ranks for years, Parallax. I know you're just trying to encourage him to continue doing what you like, but...
You can see why that remark looks kinda laughable to me, right? ( :
~~~~~~~~
Not trying to be a downer, but just remember that, even when a set bombs for you, that very same set just might be my favorite ever. There's literally "no accounting for taste" ~ and we are amazingly diverse in our tastes.
So, if you don't like a set, say so if you want/need... but then, sit back and wait to see what tomorrow brings.
It just might be your favorite set ever!
...or, at least... so far. ( :

  • 1

:)

  • 0

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy

  • 0

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solipsism

  • 1

'k, once again, you've left me far, far behind, Parallax... Explanation, please? ( :
Pretty please?

  • 2

:)))

  • 2

Lovely girl! Nice photos!

  • 0

My goodness, Sarika is so beautiful! And her breasts have such a lovely shape. Thanks to both Sarika and Rylsky for this charming visit.

More sets of our models on the MetArt Network: